David Lang, something of a reluctant maker, is on a journey, intensively immersing himself in maker culture and learning as many DIY skills as he can, through a generous arrangement with our pals at TechShop. He’s regularly chronicling his efforts in this column — what he’s learning, who he’s meeting, and what hurdles he’s clearing (um… or not). –Gareth
In my last post, I heralded the underrated benefits of analog drawing and why I think it’s the perfect gateway to making. The post was not, however, meant to take anything away from the incredible benefits of computer-aided tools. In fact, after last night’s ShopBot class at TechShop, I have an even higher respect for how amazing computer-based tools can be.
The ShopBot class was a long time coming. It was something I’d been building towards and looking forward to. In addition to the hands-on classes I’ve been taking at TechShop, I’ve also been preparing on and learning the software side of things as well. TechShop has a generous arrangement with Autodesk, and all of their classes – Intro to Autodesk, Autodesk Inventor, and Autodesk Assemblies – are free for TechShop members. There are also a few introductory CNC courses that take place in the computer lab – Intro to CNC, and CAD to CAM. Even though I didn’t have a clue what those letters meant, or what I was going to use it for, everyone on the TechShop team said it would be critical for the Zero to Maker journey. They were right.
I’m assuming some people are starting from zero (like me), so I think it might help to begin by defining some of these abbreviations:
CAD (Computer Aided Design) – Software that aids in the design process. I’ve been using Autodesk, but it can refer to any computer design program that designs products, parts, or architecture. The advantages over analog drawing and drafting are immense, as Christian commented on the last Zero to Maker post about the ability to make last-minute changes to please customers and clients
CAM (Computer-Aided Manufacturing) – The software used to control the CNC machine tools. CAM software is the bridge from CAD designs to CNC machines – it turns the designs into a readable program for the machine to execute. At TechShop, the CAD to CAM class covers VCarve Pro and Cut3D.
If you’re anything like me, all these new abbreviations and courses make the process seem a bit overwhelming. When I was a few Autodesk classes into the process, I still felt like I was miles away from being capable of using any of these tools. However, after taking the ShopBot class, I realized that I was very close all along. The trajectory or learning curve for the CNC machines is far different than the traditional skills, like woodworking or metalworking – once you get a few of the basics down, you’ve opened the door to a world of possibility.
Our ShopBot instructor was Carter Stokum, the same instructor I had for the Intro to CNC and CAD to CAM software class. If you had to learn how to use an (initially) intimidating new tool, Carter, with his casual, laid back attitude and obvious mastery of the equipment, is exactly the right person to teach you. He began the ShopBot course just like all the other classes I’d taken with him: a warning that he tends to talk quickly, a directive to slow him down if we need to, and a round of introductions from the students to understand our experience and goals for the course. After the formalities, we dug right in. The course picks up right where the previous classes left off. We toured the machines and set the drill bits – the same process we had talked about in the software classes. The fact that we had watched videos and talked through the entire process really helped to alleviate any intimidation.
Then the magic happens. The first time you see one of the CNC machines cutting a part, you understand why this is so important, why you read articles about the growing maker movement and why working at TechShop feels like you’re somewhere special. Not because these tools are new or that they’re doing anything too extraordinary, but because someone like me – a totally uncoordinated novice – can use them to effectively make… well, so many different things! If you think about the costs, this can be done for less than a few hundred dollars with a TechShop membership or even your own DIY CNC. This is a whole new ball game.
As I walked out of the class, I saw Mark Hatch, TechShop’s CEO, sitting at a table near the front entrance. Mark and I had met a few times before, but given my recent epiphany, I was eager to update him on the latest. I explained to him my big revelation – how I have glimpsed the bigger picture of what this tool access can mean. He just nodded and smiled. He knew exactly what I was talking about. He’s watched it unfold for years now, and added some incredible statistics to back up what I’d just experienced. He listed a number of the machines in the shop, and the incredible price drops that have happened in the past 15 years. Each TechShop has over $750,000 in equipment, but an even more interesting stat would be the 1995 value of that machinery (I have no idea what it would be, but please drop any estimation methodology in the comments and I’ll follow through).
I left with a whole new appreciation and excitement for this Zero to Maker process. Not because of anything I did, but for what MAKEm what TechShop is doing, what sites like Adafruit are doing and everyone else who’s working to provide more access to tools. For me, this is much more interesting than learning new skills, it’s a front row seat to the future, a guided tour of the coming age of decentralized and personal manufacturing. I could feel the excitement before, but I didn’t really understand it. Now I know what I’m looking at!
Bill Secunda’s sculpture Mantis Dreaming was inspired by The Verve’s song Catching The Butterfly. Of it, he writes:
The work stands twenty feet tall, weighs 1.5 tons, and was welded together from scrap steel (most of which came from a junked rail tanker) over the course of about six months. It’s now listed as a “Top 10″ entry in the ongoing ArtPrize 2011 contest in Grand Rapids, MI.
There’s more than just one 32-bit PIC based “Arduino-compatible” on the block and this one, the Pinguino, is a board that I was pretty interested in – mostly because it’s from a maker (for makers) not a company so much and the efforts towards an open source tool chain. I emailed the designer and maker of this board asking about its history, the differences between their board and the chipKIT Uno32. Keep reading for a fantastic overview with Jean-Pierre Mandon and Tsvetan Usunov.
PT: Thanks for answering these questions!
Jean-Pierre Mandon: Great to see you are interested with Pinguino. We are now working on the next release which should include a lot of great stuff (OTG support for Android ADB, zigbee low cost shield and more…).
We wouldn’t try to claim that the Pinguino is a “100% Arduino compatible board” as Microchip said for the chipKIT. Our goal is to add functionality to the original Arduino board as we did for 8 the bit version. CDC support is one of those improvements (just use it with simple instructions) and OTG for the PIC32 will be managed in the same spirit.
And of course, one of our main restrictions and challenges was to provide an Open Source chain. Some month ago, we decided to build (from the GCC source) our own tool chain for PIC32, the next step will be to port Pinguino on the OLIMEXINO board (ARM) with the same functionalities.
Finally, the goal of Pinguino is not to be a Microchip board but to be used on many different boards without the need of low level knowledge of the micro-controller used.
PT: What’s history behind the Pinguino?
Jean-Pierre: Pinguino project started in 2008. The main goal was to make a development board you can build in your garage. This tool was originally designed for art students (one of my jobs is a teacher in the robotic lab of the Aix en provence school of art). You can build a Pinguino with a $4 micro-controller that has a real USB system (the 8 bits version works with a 18F2550 or 18F4550 ) with only a few components, even on a beadboard.
I built the IDE from scratch with Python and the SDCC compiler. SDCC wasn’t a C++ compiler, so to keep compatibility with Arduino language, I used a python preprocessor translator for the C++ instructions for the C language. Since beta 2, users can add their own libraries to the IDE and some of them are licensed by their creator. (Servo, LCD etc…)
Since Beta 1, interrupt can be used in Pinguino, a callback function gives the user the ability to use all the interrupt of the chip.
As Pinguino 8 bit is not distributed, most of the people using this board built it themselves, creating their own version. A lot of different design exists and some commercial board are compatible with the bootloader and the Pinguino IDE.
In 2009, I decided to port Pinguino to the 32 bit Microchip micro-controller. The main problem was to find an open source tool chain for the board. The first design was originally made by Fred Eady from EDTP. Fred designed a breadboard board (Emperor 460) that became the first Pinguino32 board. The Pinguino IDE has been adapted to work with both the lite version of the Microchip compiler and Code sourcery MIPS. After some effort to incorporate the Microchip compiler to the Pinguino tool suite, we decided that the best solution was to build from the GCC source to create a real open source compiler for Microchip 32 bit chip. The current version of the compiler 32 bits of Pinguino is based on GCC 4.5.2 and binutils 2.21. Newlib is used as the main C library.
In 2011, Olimex decided to build a Pinguino board in the Arduino spirit to keep compatibility with existing shields. We asked to Tsvetan Usunov to build this board keeping the idea that Pinguino must be open hardware and open software, so the design should be available even if a 32 bit board is hard to build in a garage.
This board was first presented in Nuremberg for Embedded world this year. 3 months later, Microchip and Digilent started the chipKIT board with a modified version of the Arduino IDE and a 100% compatibility (so they say). chipKIT is quite the same board as we designed, but I think our board is better!
The main differences are:
We are currently working on the next release of the IDE. This release integrates OTG support, Zigbee support, CDC support for PIC32. I am working on an Android class to use Pinguino 32 as an ADB host allowing the use of devices since Android 1.6. My next task will be to write the code to use the Pinguino 32 as an Android gadget for versions since 2.3.4. This job should be easy as the board need to be a Host board to work with the ADK.
With chipKIT, the goal of Microchip is probably to replace Atmel micro-controller by Microchip micro-controller. With Pinguino our goal is to give the ability for the user to try out many concepts without extensive knowledge. The zigbee library for example can be used with only 3 instructions ( zigbee.init, zigbee.send, zigbee.read ) and the spirit must be the same for Android ADB, ADK etc… If you already used Microchip libraries, I am sure you will understand what I wanted to explain :-)
We want to incorporate in the IDE that not only the Arduino language uses but everything which is useful, so you are not spending time studying datasheets. For the IDE, we are working on a port for ARM devices with the OLIMEXINO board.
I met Melonee Wise ( Willow garage ) at the last campus party in Valencia and we talked about ROS and how we could embed it in Pinguino32 to drive robots.
Tsvetan Usunov: Regarding the hardware side, here are the differences:
Generally speaking, PIC32-PINGUINO is the most sophisticated Arduino-like derivate on the market, looking at the schematic for the chipKIT Uno32 was designed to be cheap for production, but even there they failed with the FT232 on the board, which shows only that their software guys are no very capable if they cant use the internal USB peripherals instead of putting a useless USB RS232 converter, which only cripples the PIC32 USB power.
When we created PIC32-PINGUINO we had low power, industrial and noise-immune design in mind. If we had to make something like Uno32, we would probably do it cheaper ;) Actually there is PIC32-MICRO on the way which is with low power design, has USB-OTG, SD-CARD and all PIC32 ports available on the breakout headers. It will be about EUR12-15 retail, this new board will not be industrial grade, it will take power only from USB or by external 5-15V regulator and it is designed with breadboarding in mind for home use, we will have first prototypes next week and production in October.
For the software side JP can tell you more but here is what I noticed:
This means HARDWARE platform independence, i.e. you are not attached to specific silicon vendor, you can move your project easily through different hardware platforms using one PINGUINO IDE :)
Jean-Pierre: Regarding hardware, I think Tsvetan enumerated most of the difference between the Pinguino and chipKIT. I just want to add that we have the UEXT connector. This connector is magic, you can use UART2, I2C or SPI to drive an external shield without using space on the top of the board. The Zigbee module is a good example and we have a lot of projects ( bluetooth, wifi module which are currently under software development). I plan to design a special UEXT module that can be cascaded (for example zigbee and bluetooth, the first one using SPI, the second one using UART2).
Regarding power supply, I created some tests (here).
I think USB OTG is the most important thing as we couldn’t have developed an Android interface with a USB/serial converter and a lot of our future projects that are based on USB Host (for example, interfacing cheap webcam, mouse to be used as line follower for robotic, keyboard etc…. )
On the software side, our compiler is GCC based and C++ support is on the way. The C library is based on Newlib and totally open source. chipKIT compiler is based on GCC but the C library is based on the mips library. We can’t hope to have the source of this library, and even if some low level function have to be improved on our compiler, I think Newlib is a best choice for the user. I didn’t read the license agreement for the chipKIT, but I am not sure you can develop commercial application with this “free environment” (as usual with Microchip).
All the libraries used in Pinguino32 were written from scratch except header files for the processor and runtime. Microchip gave the Pinguino project a full license for those files authorizing to reproduce and distribute this files.
Regarding development, as said Tsvetan, our goal is to port Pinguino to other platform and keep a good compatibility within 8 bit system. For example, the Android library will be ported to the 8 bit platform with a USB host chip giving the ability for home-made user interfaces Android with a 18F chip. The goal of Pinguino is to be a set of tools, independent of the platform used.
After Android, I plan to port the FLAC library for PIC32 Pinguino to use it as an audio recorder or player without any shield.
Editor’s note: I assisted Jean-Pierre Mandon and Tsvetan Usunov with the text of this interview language/structure since english is not their native language.
The robots were made in cooperation with Icy Labs of Sydney and the piece as a whole is reminiscent of Jonah Brucker-Cohen’s !Alerting Infrastructure!. Political motivations aside, it’s a bit haunting to think about a group of robots carefully demolishing a domicile over a period of several months. I’d be curious to know what sort of AI was involved as I watch these robots in the video give little test taps with their hammers before whacking away at the drywall. [via Pruned]
At Maker Faire Bay Area 2011, Ben demonstrates PhoneSat, a project in conjunction with NASA done to prove that a cellphone can serve as a viable CPU in an orbital satellite. The Nexus One on board uses the Android OS and is monitored by an Arduino that also serves as a rebooting device.
Check out more videos from Maker Faire Bay Area 2011.
I’ve amassed a decent collection of tools since I started working in electronics – some useful & some that seemed useful at the time of acquisition. Not surprisingly, it’s the basics that prove indispensable – and the above video gives you my take on what those are exactly. Here’s hoping it helps get a few newcomers properly geared up – and maybe put a smile on the face of a few seasoned solderers.
Oh and do drop a line in the comments listing any vital items / glaring omissions (note: I classify multimeters as “test instruments”, just so yaknow)
If you are looking for a subject likely to inflame the hearts of mathematicians, make them slightly weak in the knees, and induce some distinctly poetical sentiments, Klein’s Quartic, first described by German mathematician Felix Klein in 1878, seems like a pretty good bet. Though the surface itself, per Wikipedia, “does not have a (non-trivial) 3-dimensional linear representation,” several prominent math-bloggers have produced models, projections, and plain-language written explanations attempting—and doing a pretty good job of it, IMHO—to communicate their passion for the construct:
The Eightfold Way is also the title of a sculpture derived from Klein’s Quartic that resides on the MSRI campus in Berkeley. [Thanks, Edmund!]
This QR code clock offers a fun notion — signs or other visual cues for the benefit of robots.
[Via Beyond the Beyond]
Very cool idea from Ponoko seller ticktock showroom, and reasonably priced at $100 US. Could be a fun remake, too, especially if (like me) you’ve been looking for a use for that old piece of motorcycle chain you can’t quite bring yourself to throw out. [via Boing à la Boing]
|Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498|