The TTABlog Archive for March, 2022


Click a link below to view the mailing archive as if it had been sent to you.

2022-03-31 07:00TTABlog Test: Are These Two "MW" Design Marks Confusingly Similar for Metal Fabrication Services?
2022-03-30 06:30Pro Se Intent-to-Use Applicant Wins TTAB Priority Battle in Section 2(d) Opposition to DRIPHOUSE CLOTHING & Design
2022-03-29 07:00TTABlog Test: Are Water-Based Nonalcoholic Beverages Related to Beer for Likelihood-of-Confusion Purposes?
2022-03-28 08:00TTABlog Test: Is this MUTILATION? USPTO Says "THE VILLE" Specimen of Use Did not Match the Application Drawing
2022-03-25 07:00TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
2022-03-24 07:00Pro Se Applicant Bests Monster Engergy in Section 2(d) and Dilution TTAB Battle
2022-03-23 07:30TTABlog Test: Are "LE CHOCOLAT DES ILES" and "ISLAND CHOCOLATES" Confusable for Chocolate Candy?
2022-03-22 06:30TTABlog Test: Are Supplements and Cosmetics Related for Section 2(d) Purposes?
2022-03-21 08:00TTAB Affirms Refusal of "WEGE": Specimens Fail to Show Use of Mark for Beer
2022-03-18 07:30TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
2022-03-17 08:00Viacom Wins "DOUBLE DARE" Section 2(d) TTAB Battle, Survives Abandonment Attack
2022-03-16 08:00Recommended Reading: "Navigating the Identity Thicket: Trademark's Lost Theory of Theory of Personality, The Right of Publicity, and Preemption"
2022-03-15 07:30TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Proceedings Come Out?
2022-03-14 07:30Precedential No. 7: TTAB Sanctions Party for Flagrant Violation of the Standard Protective Order
2022-03-11 07:43(Corrected) TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
2022-03-11 07:00TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
2022-03-10 07:30Precedential No. 6: Title of Single Work "STRONGHOLDS & FOLLOWERS" Fails to Function as a Trademark, Says TTAB
2022-03-09 07:00TTAB Denies Cancellation Petition for Failure to Prove Nonuse or Abandonment
2022-03-08 07:30"MADE FOR YOU LAB-GROWN DIAMONDS" Fails to Function as a Trademark For Diamonds, Says TTAB
2022-03-07 07:30Recommended Reading: Prof. Robert A. Mikos, "Unauthorized and Unwise: The Lawful Use Requirement in Trademark Law"
2022-03-04 06:30TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
2022-03-03 09:30TTABlog Test: Are Candy (Class 30) and Liquor (Class 33) Related Under Section 2(d)?
2022-03-03 07:00TTAB Posts March 2022 (Video) Hearing Schedule
2022-03-02 12:30Free Webinar, March 10th, Noon-1PM: What Non-US Practitioners Need to Know About US Trademark Law and the Recent Trademark Modernization Act ("TMA")
2022-03-02 08:00CAFC Upholds TTAB: TEEN TINKER BELL Confusable With Disney's TINKER BELL for Dolls
2022-03-01 07:30The Trademark Reporter's 2022 "Annual Review of U.S. Trademark Cases"

 

<< Archive IndexSubscribe >>