|
Here are the Atlas Shrugs email updates for you |

Atlas Shrugs - 15 new articles
Fire Jihad – Forest Fires in AmericaAl Qaeda ripping off freedom lovers -- savages nonetheless, no matter they hide and steal and mimic the call of freedom lovers. Spring 2012:
al-Qaeda’s English-language online magazine, Inspire, published an
article called “It Is of Your Freedom to Ignite a Firebomb,” which
featured instructions on how to build an incendiary bomb to light
forests on fire.
In California alone, during the first two weeks of June, wild land fires have already surpassed the total cost of the last two years of firefighting in rural areas. Most U.S. state economies seem to be rebounding this year. However, recovery from anticipated natural disasters could easily deplete their treasuries. There is little that can be done to prevent hurricane destruction. However, states, as well as the federal government, could and should more to do to minimize the effects of man-made forest fires.
The Nazi LeftLike hand in glove -- the more things change, the more they stay the same. The Nazis were, after all, the The National Socialist German Workers Party. Germany recently passed legislation to label goods coming from the territories of Israel in Judea and Samaria/the West Bank on the initiative of their left-wing parties. One interesting aspect of this is that the same identical legislation was pushed by Germany's main nazi party last year. Once again we see the ideological convergence of the modern far left and the old far left nazis becoming mainstream policy in Europe: (thanks to Golem)
Five months later, the Green Party introduced a federal bill to label “imports of products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank to Europe and Germany.” Henryk M. Broder, one of Europe’s top experts on contemporary anti-Semitism, wrote last week in a column titled “Two Souls, One Thought” in the Swiss weekly Die Weltwoche that the Green and Nazi parliamentary initiatives to label products are “at their core identical.” Both initiatives use the historical model of the German Nazi regime boycotts of Jewish businesses starting on April 1, 1933, and invoking the mass slogan: “Germans defend yourselves. Do not buy from Jews!” Broder wrote. Dr. Efraim Zuroff, head of the Simon Wiesenthal’s Jerusalem office, told the Post on Thursday, “The fact that a mainstream German party initiates such a measure is a sad reflection of the distorted view of Middle East politics so common in recent years in the political discourse regarding Israel in certain circles of the Federal Republic. In that respect we see an unfortunate growing erosion of the traditional German support for the Jewish state which is part of a dangerous tendency in elements of German society and certain intellectual circles to extricate Germany from its moral obligations in the wake of the Holocaust.” Zuroff, the world’s leading hunter of Nazi war criminals, added, “The initiative by the Green Party to have all products produced in the disputed territories is clearly short-sighted and counterproductive and will not help bring Israelis and Palestinians any closer to real and lasting peace.” He said the Green deputy Kerstin Müller, who helped engineer the initiative targeting Israeli settlement products, is incapable of running her party’s Heinrich Böll Foundation in Tel Aviv. She is slated to take over as director in late 2013. “Obviously, a person who played a leading role in this initiative is uniquely unsuitable to represent the Böll Foundation in Israel, but perhaps they have an opening available in Ramallah,” Zuroff said. Marc Berthold, the outgoing director of the Böll Foundation in Tel Aviv, declined to be interviewed by the Post. Müller refused to answer Post queries. Steinberg urged Israel’s government to examine Müller’s fitness to run the foundation. “The Böll Foundation – which exploits German taxpayer funds to impose its interests and ideology on Israeli democracy – repeatedly violates civil society norms. It is up to the Israeli political system, including the Knesset and actual civil society groups that do not represent external interests, to decide how best to respond to this anti-democratic manipulation,” Steinberg said. Israel’s embassy in Berlin accused the Greens of singling out the Jewish state for disparate treatment. Ralf Fücks, head of the Berlin-based Böll Foundation, defended Müller as experienced and capable of running the Green Party office in Tel Aviv. He declined to respond to a Post query about the similarities between the neo-Nazi and Green Party initiatives covering Israeli settlement products.
VIDEO: Obama-Backed Syrian Jihadists Brutally Behead and Execute 2 WomenAmerica's pro-savage foreign policy:
BRUTAL BEHEADING OF BOY AND EXECUTION OF WOMAN BY SYRIAN REBELS (thanks to Golem) Atlas Auction!Here's a first. I am holding the first Atlas Auction ever! This SION poster we are auctioning off will be signed by Robert Spencer and me (the only one of its kind). This is the SION flag, and it will be the waving it proudly (along with the American flag) at our demo with Tommy Robinson and the EDL on Armed Forces Day, June 29th, in the UK. Help us fund this trip, our ad campaigns and demo initiatives. The above poster is not signed, because the cynic that I am doesn't want anyone to download and copy, but the winner will receive a signed poster. Thanks to Big Fur Hat for this fabu idea. BID BIG AND BID OFTEN -- THE AUCTION ENDS FRIDAY NIGHT. Place your bids in the comment section -- largest bid takes the prize.
Islamic Terrorist Earns Hebrew U. Doctorate, Refuses to Shake Hands with Hebrew University PresidentJewicidal asshattery. "Terrorist Earns Hebrew U. Doctorate, Refuses to Shake Hands by Maayana Miskin Terrorist Earns Hebrew U. PhD, Refuses Handshake" Arutz Sheva, June 18, 2013 The attack was thwarted three days before it was to have taken place. Security forces arrested the would-be suicide bomber in Ramallah, and detained the “doctor” in his home in Jerusalem. He was sentenced to three years in prison for the crime. In the wake of his arrest Hebrew University decided to bar him from its laboratories for safety reasons. A statement from Hebrew University read, “Hebrew University does not prevent people with a criminal background from learning within its gates. His work was found worthy from an academic perspective, and he met all the criteria to receive a doctorate. However, it should be noted that he did not get permission to use the university’s laboratories following his conviction.” Aslan Media chief Nathan Lean threatens California Catholic school to drop Robert Spencer from conference -- or elseLook how the machine has grown. Look at this coalition of destroyers. Once they were on the margins of society, where they belong. But now, because of the Obama administration and media sanction, they have risen to a power like that of the SS and SA in prewar Nazi Germany. I urge freedom lovers (Atlas readers) to support Kolbe Academy in standing strong against this neo-fascism. Nathan Lean is a goon, and we will not be bullied or intimidated by thugs and goons. We know where that leads. Aslan Media chief Nathan Lean threatens California Catholic school to drop Robert Spencer from conference -- or else Robert Spencer at Jihadwatch I am scheduled to speak at a conference in Sacramento, California, on July 26 and 27, sponsored by Kolbe Academy, a national Catholic educational program in Napa, California. But my obsessive Internet stalker, the thuggish Nathan Lean, has found out about it. Lean, aka "Garibaldi," the creepy Travis Bickle of jihad enablers, is a stalker who has threatened me repeatedly, repeats what he knows to be falsehoods about my record, and has called on hackers to destroy this site. Consistent with the ongoing Leftist/Islamic supremacist war against the freedom of speech, and desperate fear that anyone will hear the truth about Islam and jihad, Lean mailed this threatening letter to several Kolbe Academy officials:It has come to my attention that Mr. Robert Spencer, a prominent anti-Muslim blogger and activist, will appear at the Northern California Catholic Family Home School Conference in Sacramento, California on July 26/27, 2013. Spencer is listed on the website and Facebook page as a confirmed speaker. Obama announces "Peace" talks with Taliban Savages
The Obama Administration announced that it will meet with the Taliban in Doha for “peace talks.” The Taliban continue to orchestrate insider attacks, killing our soldiers. They continue to poison girls’ schools across Afghanistan, kidnap Red Cross workers, enforce the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth (the Sharia), and call for the defeat of American and coalition forces. These jihadists behead Afghan children, slaughter Afghans who dare to attend a party where dancing takes place, and mean to run Mullah Omar for President, despite the fact that there is still a $10-million-dollar reward on his head. Omar sheltered Osama bin Laden prior to the 9/11 attacks; he had a hand in the 9/11 attacks; and he has directed the Taliban’s ongoing war against U.S.-led NATO forces. On what basis could a peace conference move forward? It is, in fact, a surrender. The Taliban have done nothing to move towards peace. They are savages, and you cannot make peace with savages. A “political settlement” is Obama-speak for surrender to jihad. The Obama Administration may insist that the Taliban break ties with al-Qaeda and end the violence, but they have given absolutely no indication that they are prepared to do that. If anything, just the opposite.The number of green-on-blue attacks has skyrocketed, now accounting for over fifteen percent of coalition deaths. Our troops are being sacrificed to the politically correct refusal to state the truth about Islam. These are senseless murders that are only possible because the Obama administration refuses to acknowledge the motive and ideology of jihadic doctrine. How are our soldiers supposed to distinguish the jihadists from people on our side? Worse still, the Department of Defense lies about these murders in order to prop up their failed policy. The number of green-on-blue attacks has skyrocketed, but US policy remains the same. Our boys and girls are sitting ducks. In 2012 they accounted for 15% of Coalition deaths. 2013 will dwarf that. In 2011, green-on-blue attacks accounted for 6%; in 2010, 2%; in 2009, 2%; and in 2008, less than 1%. And the Obama Administration is rewarding the Taliban with peace talks and prisoner exchanges? It borders on sedition.Obama loves these savages. The Taliban are on the vanguard of the tsunami of Islamic supremacist movements that Obama empowered, armed and supported. Their resurrection, after Bush decimated them, is due to Obama’s support and sanction. And now he is about to hand them final victory. New Iranian president's son killed himself "over father's extremism"But, but but the enemedia said he's a moderate! Except he's not -- read Atlas here and here.
NEW IRANIAN PRESIDENT'S SON KILLED HIMSELF "OVER FATHER'S EXTREMISM" By Tom Gross The leading London-based pan-Arab newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat reports today that Iranian President-Elect Hassan Rouhani's eldest son took his own life in 1992, in protest at his father's involvement with Iran's murderous Islamic regime and his father's close ties to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "I hate your government, your lies, your corruption, your religion, your double acts and your hypocrisy," wrote the future president's son in his suicide note, according to the Saudi-owned paper. "I am ashamed to live in such an environment where I'm forced to lie to my friends each day, telling them that my father isn't part of all of this. Telling them my father loves this nation, whereas I believe this to be not true. It makes me sick seeing you, my father, kiss the hand of Khamenei." The official Iranian press, which is controlled by Khamenei, has admitted that Rouhani's eldest son committed suicide in 1992 but the regime's media denied it was a political act. Rouhani has said in the past that his son committed "a great sin" by killing himself, but he still made sure his son was buried in a prime plot in the temple of the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini. --------------------------------------------------------------- ROUHANI, AN EXTREMIST WHO HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION SINCE ITS MURDEROUS BEGINNING Many western media are continuing to report that Rouhani is a "moderate" (for example: "Iran Moderate Wins Presidency by a Large Margin" www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/world/middleeast/iran-election.html and "Moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani wins Iran's presidential vote" www.washingtonpost.com/world/iranians-await-presidential-election-results-following-extension-of-polling-hours/2013/06/15/3800c276-d593-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html ) and "centrist" (the BBC's term). Here is what they are not telling you: Rouhani has been involved in the Islamic revolution since its murderous beginning. In 1978 he moved to France to join Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic revolution, who was living in exile in Paris. He then helped found the Islamic regime in Tehran and for the last three decades has been intimately involved in its security apparatus (which has killed and tortured hundreds of thousands of people). Among the security positions Rouhani has held: * He was chairman of the Majles Defense Committee from 1985-1989 * He was deputy commander-in-chief during the Iran-Iraq War from 1988-1989 * He was supreme commander of civil defense from 1985-1990, and commander of the Khatam-ol-Anbiya Headquarters * His most notable position was Chairman of the Supreme National Security Council (1989-2005), the period in which the Supreme National Security Council helped mastermind the 1994 bombing of the Jewish cultural center in Buenos Aires, killing 85 people (including many elderly Holocaust survivors), and of the Khobar Towers in 1996, killing 19 U.S. airmen He is still Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's personal representative on the council, and informed sources say that Khamenei engineered his victory in last weekend's election as a ruse to fool the West, to help western powers lower their guard � as some western diplomats already appear to be doing. --------------------------------------------------------------- EDUCATED IN SCOTLAND Like many leading members of other extreme anti-Western organizations such as Hamas and al-Qaeda, Rouhani also has received an extensive Western education in addition to his religious training. He has a B.A. in law from Tehran University as well as an M.A. and Ph.D. in law from Glasgow Caledonian University in Scotland. --------------------------------------------------------------- ROUHANI EASILY OUTWITTED THE NUCLEAR NEGOTIATORS FROM GERMANY, FRANCE AND BRITAIN Intelligence sources say that Rouhani easily outwitted and out-negotiated the European troika of nuclear negotiators from Germany, France and Britain, from 2003-5 when he was Iran's chief nuclear negotiator. Indeed Rouhani later boasted of doing so to colleagues in Farsi. Rouhani has also admitted that he exploited diplomacy to advance his country's nuclear program. He made clear during a little-known address to the Iranian parliament in 2004 that he viewed Pakistan as a role model for his country's effort to master the nuclear fuel cycle in the face of world opposition. --------------------------------------------------------------- A READER WRITES� In response to my dispatch on Sunday concerning Rouhani's election victory, a reader writes: Just watching headlines in the major U.S. dailies, first I learned that only conservatives had been allowed to run in Iran's presidential election. Then I learned that a moderate was ahead. Finally, I've learned that a reformist has won. Things change so fast! *** I attach three articles below. The first is from 2006 from my former colleague at The Sunday Telegraph, Phil Sherwell; and the second two are by Lee Smith and Michael Freund, both long-time subscribers to this email list. -- Tom Gross --------------------------------------------------------------- ARTICLES HOW WE DUPED THE WEST, BY IRAN'S NUCLEAR NEGOTIATOR How we duped the West, by Iran's nuclear negotiator By Philip Sherwell in Washington The Sunday Telegraph (London) March 5, 2006 The man who for two years led Iran's nuclear negotiations has laid out in unprecedented detail how the regime took advantage of talks with Britain, France and Germany to forge ahead with its secret atomic programme. In a speech to a closed meeting of leading Islamic clerics and academics, Hassan Rowhani, who headed talks with the so-called EU3 until last year, revealed how Teheran played for time and tried to dupe the West after its secret nuclear programme was uncovered by the Iranian opposition in 2002. He boasted that while talks were taking place in Teheran, Iran was able to complete the installation of equipment for conversion of yellowcake - a key stage in the nuclear fuel process - at its Isfahan plant but at the same time convince European diplomats that nothing was afoot. "From the outset, the Americans kept telling the Europeans, 'The Iranians are lying and deceiving you and they have not told you everything.' The Europeans used to respond, 'We trust them'," he said. Revelation of Mr Rowhani's remarks comes at an awkward moment for the Iranian government, ahead of a meeting tomorrow of the United Nations' atomic watchdog, which must make a fresh assessment of Iran's banned nuclear operations. The judgment of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is the final step before Iran's case is passed to the UN Security Council, where sanctions may be considered. In his address to the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution, Mr Rowhani appears to have been seeking to rebut criticism from hardliners that he gave too much ground in talks with the European troika. The contents of the speech were published in a regime journal that circulates among the ruling elite. He told his audience: "When we were negotiating with the Europeans in Teheran we were still installing some of the equipment at the Isfahan site. There was plenty of work to be done to complete the site and finish the work there. In reality, by creating a tame situation, we could finish Isfahan." America and its European allies believe that Iran is clandestinely developing an atomic bomb but Teheran insists it is merely seeking nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Iran's negotiating team engaged in a last-ditch attempt last week to head off Security Council involvement. In January the regime removed IAEA seals on sensitive nuclear equipment and last month it resumed banned uranium enrichment. Iran is trying to win support from Russia, which opposes any UN sanctions, having unsuccessfully tried to persuade European leaders to give them more time. Against this backdrop, Mr Rowhani's surprisingly candid comments on Iran's record of obfuscation and delay are illuminating. He described the regime's quandary in September 2003 when the IAEA had demanded a "complete picture" of its nuclear activities. "The dilemma was if we offered a complete picture, the picture itself could lead us to the UN Security Council," he said. "And not providing a complete picture would also be a violation of the resolution and we could have been referred to the Security Council for not implementing the resolution." Mr Rowhani disclosed that on at least two occasions the IAEA obtained information on secret nuclear-related experiments from academic papers published by scientists involved in the work. The Iranians' biggest setback came when Libya secretly negotiated with America and Britain to close down its nuclear operations. Mr Rowhani said that Iran had bought much of its nuclear-related equipment from "the same dealer" - a reference to the network of A Q Khan, the rogue Pakistani atomic scientist. From information supplied by Libya, it became clear that Iran had bought P2 advanced centrifuges. In a separate development, the opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) has obtained a copy of a confidential parliamentary report making clear that Iranian MPs were also kept in the dark on the nuclear programme, which was funded secretly, outside the normal budgetary process. Mohammad Mohaddessin, the NCRI's foreign affairs chief, told the Sunday Telegraph: "Rowhani's remarks show that the mullahs wanted to deceive the international community from the onset of negotiations with EU3 - and that the mullahs were fully aware that if they were transparent, the regime's nuclear file would be referred to the UN immediately." --------------------------------------------------------------- IRAN PICKS A NEW LEADER TO READ FROM THE SAME SCRIPT He's no 'moderate': Iran picks a new leader to read from the same script By Lee Smith The Weekly Standard June 17, 2013 It's not clear why much of the Western media continues to describe Iran's newly elected president as a "moderate." After all, Hassan Rouhani is a regime pillar: As an early follower of the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Rouhani joined him in exile in Paris, and over the last 34 years, the 64-year-old Qom-educated cleric has held key positions in the regime's political echelons, and served in top military jobs during Iran's decade-long war with Iraq. As Iran's chief interlocutor with the West on the regime's nuclear portfolio, Rouhani boasted of deceiving his negotiating partners. Domestically, he has threatened to crush protestors "mercilessly and monumentally," and likely participated in the campaign of assassinations of the regime's Iranian enemies at home and abroad, especially in Europe. Currently, Rouhani serves as Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's representative on the supreme national security council. Aside from the fact that Iran's English-language television station Press TV calls him a moderate, what exactly, in the eyes of the West, makes him one? After all, former president Muhammad Khatami labeled his public diplomacy campaign a "dialogue of civilizations," which played right into Western ideas of tolerance and moderation. But Rouhani has nothing similar in his past. "I think he gets that label because he has been Rafsanjani's factotum," says former CIA officer Reuel Marc Gerecht. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, another regime pillar and former president of Iran, is typically referred to as a "pragmatist" in the Western press. "Compared to Khamenei's circle, these fellows seem moderate," says Gerecht. "Rouhani ran their little think tank around which foreign-policy types, the types that Westerners meet, gathered. Also, Rouhani was party to the only temporary 'freeze' in Iran's nuke program. Some folks � most notably the EU's Javier Solana � made a lot out of this. They should not have." In reality, all Rouhani did was play the U.S. and EU off each other. "From the outset," Rouhani said in 2006, "the Americans kept telling the Europeans, 'The Iranians are lying and deceiving you and they have not told you everything.' The Europeans used to respond, 'We trust them.' � When we were negotiating with the Europeans in Tehran we were still installing some of the equipment at the Isfahan site. There was plenty of work to be done to complete the site and finish the work there. In reality, by creating a tame situation, we could finish Isfahan." Accordingly, a number of analysts wonder if Rouhani's election is meant to serve the same purpose now in buying more time for the Iranian nuclear weapons program. With the regime putting a friendly, "moderate" face in front, the West is likely to double down on its efforts to reach the long sought after diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear issue. As if on cue, the White House responded enthusiastically to Rouhani's victory and announced that it is prepared, again, to enter direct negotiations. "There's a great opportunity for Iran," said White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, "and the people of that storied country, to have the kind of future that they would, I think, justifiably want." The presidential election didn't offer much insight into what the Iranian people want. With a reported turnout of 72 percent of the country's 50 million registered voters, informed sources in Iran charge that the regime exaggerated the actual turnout by a factor of 4 or 5. This election is almost certainly as fraudulent, if not more so, than the contested 2009 elections that brought the Green revolution to the streets. Up until last week, Tehran mayor Mohamed Baqer Qalibaf was leading in pre-election polling with 32.7 percent, Jalili was in second with 28.7 with Rouhani and the rest trailing. By Thursday, after the other reform candidate, Mohamed Reza Aref, dropped out, Rouhani had taken a commanding lead. In a poll conducted by the independent Virginia-based consultancy service IPOS, Rouhani was at 31.7 percent, with Qalibaf at 24.1 percent and Jalili at 13.7 percent. Another poll conducted by a website affiliated with the government showed that Rouhani was leading with 43 percent. Even then the final tally far exceeded the expectations of the regime polling, with Rouhani winning with slightly more than 50 percent. It would appear that the regime ran up the number in order to avoid any chances of a run-off that might return protestors to the streets again. Nonetheless, there were some demonstrations Saturday in Tehran, with protestors demanding the government release all political prisoners and invoking the Green revolution's martyr Neda Agha Soltan � "the lady of Iran," they chanted, "your path is continuing� Don't be afraid, we are all together." Elsewhere, the Islamic Republic is showing what's in store for domestic opponents. In Iraq, the Iranian-affiliated militia Kataeb Hezbollah launched a rocket attack against Camp Liberty, where around 3000 members of the Mujahideen e-Khalq (MEK) have been living since they were moved from Camp Ashraf, with U.S. and UN assurances for their security. John Kerry issued a statement saying that "the United States strongly condemns today's brutal, senseless, and utterly unacceptable rocket attack on Camp Hurriya that killed and injured camp residents." Two were killed in the attack and dozens wounded. Attacking Camp Liberty sends a message to everyone who is committed to overthrowing the regime, says Ali Safavi, the U.S. spokesman for the National Council of Resistance in Iran , an umbrella organization with the MEK as its largest member. "The MEK is leading the opposition calling for the overthrow of the regime," says Safavi, who believes that there's a connection between the elections and the attack on Liberty. "A month after the June 2009 elections, they attacked Camp Ashraf. In February 2011 there were huge demonstrations and in April Ashraf was again attacked, with 36 killed." With Saturday's attack, says Safavi, the regime is sending a message � "'Don't even think about overthrowing the regime.' Their language is rockets and bullets." And the man the regime has chosen to read from that script, its newly elected front man, is no moderate. IRAN'S NEW FANATIC-IN-CHIEF Iran's new fanatic-in-chief By Michael Freund The Jerusalem Post June 18, 2013 Eleven years ago, a middle-aged, up-and-coming Iranian cleric sat down for a rare interview with ABC News. Though largely unknown to the West at the time, the bespectacled mullah served as chairman of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and was a key adviser to the Iranian president. Despite knowing that he was appearing before a Western audience, the turbaned official made little effort to hide his uncompromising and extremist views. When asked why then-US President George W. Bush had included Iran as part of the "axis of evil," for example, the partisan Persian did not hesitate to invoke an anti-Semitic canard, blaming the Jews for America's policy. "After September 11," he said, "the hardliners, especially the Zionist lobby, became more active and, unfortunately, influenced Mr. Bush." A few minutes later, perhaps concerned that he had not gotten his point across, he went out of his way to reiterate that, "What we really see in the decision-making is the influence of the Zionist lobby. They are very influential in the administration as well as with members of Congress." The man who uttered those hateful words is none other than Hassan Rouhani, the new president-elect of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Yes, that Hassan Rouhani, the same one that much of the Western media is attempting to portray as a judicious and reasonable man. "Moderate Wins Iran's Presidential Election," crowed National Public Radio. "Rouhani an Advocate of Peace," insisted The Australian. But don't let the screaming headlines fool you. The assertion that Rouhani is a moderate is absolute hogwash, marinated in self-delusion and garnished with sheer ignorance. Sure, when compared with outgoing nutcase Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Rouhani is relatively restrained. But that's like saying Attila the Hun was a moderate when measured up against Genghis Khan. In other words, it is a distinction without a difference. Rouhani has spent more than two decades as part of Iran's national security apparatus, which has used violence and terror at home and abroad to preserve the rule of the ayatollahs. From 2003 to 2005, as Teheran's chief nuclear negotiator, his task was to dither, delay and dissemble in talks with the West while Iran's nuclear scientists advanced toward the atomic finish line. And for the past eight years, Rouhani was one of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's two personal representatives on Iran's Supreme National Security Council. His record is one of slavish loyalty to the thuggish theocracy that was installed after the downfall of the Shah in 1979, and there is simply no reason whatsoever to think that this close confidante of Khamenei will suddenly become an Iranian F.W. De Klerk or Mikhail Gorbachev. Indeed, if Rouhani's public statements are any indication, Iran's hostile stance appears certain to continue. In the ABC interview that he gave in September 2002, Rouhani justified Palestinian suicide bombers, saying that, "Palestinians can use any means to kick out the occupier." He defended Hezbollah as "a legitimate political group," called Israel "a terrorist nation" and refused to condemn the March 2002 Passover Massacre, when a Hamas suicide bomber blew himself up at a Passover Seder at the Park Hotel in Netanya, murdering 30 Israelis and wounding 140 others. More recently, in a meeting with the Turkish ambassador on January 11, 2012, Rouhani came to the defense of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, even as the latter was busy slaughtering his fellow citizens. "Syria has constantly been on the frontline of fighting Zionism and this resistance line must not be weakened," Rouhani was quoted as saying by the Iranian and Syrian press. "Syria," he added, "has a particular position in the region and in the past 60 years has formed the resistance line against the Zionist regime." And if you thought that the race for the presidency might serve to soften his views, think again. In an interview with Al-Sharq al-Awsat last week, Rouhani denounced what he called Israel's "inhuman policies and practices in Palestine and the Middle East." To be sure, Rouhani has been making noises about reforming Iran's economy and loosening the regime's stifling grip on the Iranian people. But while his election to the presidency does constitute a change of faces, it hardly signals a change in policy. The departure of Ahmadinejad from the scene is certainly welcome news, and few will miss his rancorous and vitriolic anti-Semitic and anti-Western tirades. But the results of Iran's presidential balloting are hardly a reason to celebrate. Iran may have a relatively more moderate fanatic-in-chief in the form of Hassan Rouhani, but a fanatic he most assuredly is. Muslim is Awarded Damages after he refuses to shake Female boss' handCivilization suicide: Where are the feminazis? Busy condemning my truth ads, of course. Check out Bab's asshattery. "No review for hand-shake discrimination case" The Local, June 18, 2013 (thanks to After Seven)
The female supervisor then reportedly told the man that he could not intern at the office if he was not comfortable shaking everybody's hand. She also allegedly added that the office had hand sanitizer that he could use. While the incident was later reported to the Equality Ombudsman, the national office that investigates suspected cases of discrimination, the case was settled before the ombudsman began its investigation, with Trollhättan municipality choosing to pay damages to the man. "By law, a person who feels they've been disadvantaged because of their religion has a right to damages. We made a mistake, we took responsibility for it, and the person was compensated," municipal spokesman Said Niklund told the TTELA newspaper. Last month, it was reported that the incident had had repercussions at the workplace, damaging the m
Dutch soccer official beaten to death by Muslims in HollandThe
only adult, also the father of one of the accused, Hasan D., was jailed
for six years, while five teens were sent to youth detention units for
the maximum of two years, six months suspended.
A sixth adolescent convict, aged 15, was sent to a youth detention unit for a year with two months suspended. The seventh teen, also 15, was acquitted of the killing but convicted of hitting the rival team's goalkeeper. Interestingly enough, Al Jazeera was actually quite clear that the offenders were Muslims. (thanks to Armaros)
The only adult, also the father of one of the accused, Hasan D., was jailed for six years, while five teens were sent to youth detention units for the maximum of two years, six months suspended. A sixth adolescent convict, aged 15, was sent to a youth detention unit for a year with two months suspended. The seventh teen, also 15, was acquitted of the killing but convicted of hitting the rival team's goalkeeper. "We're happy with the high sentences, because the worst thing for me is that they never admitted what they did," his widow Xandra Nieuwenhuizen told journalists outside the court, arm in arm with her three sons. "This verdict gives us some kind of closure," she said on the verge of tears. "Enough of violence in football, enough of violence in Dutch football," said his son Mykel Nieuwenhuizen, 16, who witnessed the deadly assault on his father. The eighth defendant was acquitted of the killing but ordered detained for 30 days, 17 of them suspended, because "he only hit the opposing side's goalkeeper," the court ruling said. "The conclusion is that the violence the suspects committed is the reason for Nieuwenhuizen's death," the judge said after an expert had said the death could be blamed on a genetic anomaly. Prosecution spokeswoman Susanne Terporten said she was "fairly satisfied" with the sentences. "The fact that they never confessed is hard for the family, because it means that they will never know exactly what happened," she said. "It looked like they were kicking a ball," the judge quoted a witness as saying as she read out the verdict.
Turkey Erdogan's SS Police reportedly raid homes, arrest suspected protestersMore totalitarianism from Obama's favorite and "most trusted ally":
You can run, you can rip -- but you can't hide from the truthAs soon as our ads go up, Islamic supremacists and their leftist goons rip them down -- so afraid are they of the truth reaching the people. We will not be stopped. The truth will keep us free. Nigeria: Devout Muslims murder eleven in attack on schoolDespite the thousands murdered in the cause of Islam, Obama refuses to designate Boko Haram (translation: Western education is bad) a terrorist group. If not them, who?
Nigeria: Islamic jihadists murder eleven in attack on school (thanks to Jihadwatch)
Vigilante groups armed with machetes and sticks have joined the effort to oust Islamist insurgents in the northeast, prompting concerns by some residents that this will lead to a breakdown in law and order. The military has cautiously welcomed the support, while warning it must not lead to witch-hunts or the settling of scores. Lazarus said three soldiers were critically wounded during a separate attack by Boko Haram targeting the military in Damaturu, and three insurgents had been arrested. Nigerian forces say their offensive has enabled them to wrest back control of the country's remote northeast from Boko Haram. They say they have destroyed key bases and arrested more than 150 suspected insurgents in the states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa -- all covered by a state of emergency declared by President Goodluck Jonathan last month. Some Nigerians saw the push as long overdue. But rights groups and aid agencies fear the longer it goes on, the more the region's vulnerable local population, which includes some of the poorest people on earth, will suffer. The offensive has forced more than 6,000 refugees - mostly women, children and the elderly - to flee to neighbouring Niger, the U.N. refugee agency said last week. Muslims Nearly Hack to Death Pastor in TanzaniaThe global jihad. Tanzania heats up...... name a country where Muslims immigrate and there is conflict.
Pastor in Tanzania Hacked Nearly to Death as the Nation Sees Rise in Radical Islamists Two nights before the attack on Pastor Ngai, the home of Pastor Daudi Nzumbi in Geita also came under attack. Pastor Nzumbi leads the Free Pentecostal Church of Tanzania congregation in Geita. Thankfully, the attackers fled after they were confronted by Pastor Nzumbi’s large, barking dogs. When Pastor Nzumbi heard his dogs barking, he looked out the window and saw the attackers. He called the police, but the officer in charge told him, “I cannot protect every pastor!” ... [Full Story] Germany: Muslim Threatens People With Knives While Holding Koran and Shouting "Allahu Akbar!"Hmmmm, what part of the quran was this devout young man reading? Give the enemedia five minutes and they will figure out a way to blame it on the counter jihad movement. Hamburg: Libyan Refugee Threatens People With Knives While Holding Koran and Shouting "Allahu Akbar!" (thanks to The Religion of Peace.com via Islam vs. Europe) This is almost certainly one of the "refugees" who was given 500 euros by the Italian government and told to go to Germany. They set up camp a few weeks ago in Hamburg. Some 300 African refugees currently living behind Hamburg's Bismarck monument reportedly received €500 from the Italian government to leave for Germany. Officials are unsure what to do next, as they have no shelter and no money.
More Recent Articles |
| Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |